<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 15 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34752</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the orders of the Tribunal and CIT (Appeal) and remanded the case for a fresh decision within three months. The Court found errors in the assessment process, including lack of evidence for enhancing closing stock and deviations from legal principles and accounting practices. The appeal was allowed based on identified issues and discrepancies in the tax assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 15 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34752</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the orders of the Tribunal and CIT (Appeal) and remanded the case for a fresh decision within three months. The Court found errors in the assessment process, including lack of evidence for enhancing closing stock and deviations from legal principles and accounting practices. The appeal was allowed based on identified issues and discrepancies in the tax assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>