<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 14 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34751</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue and the lack of concrete evidence for income concealment. It stressed the importance of providing reasons for penalties and the requirement for solid evidence before penalizing for income concealment. The appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income-tax was dismissed based on these considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 14 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34751</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue and the lack of concrete evidence for income concealment. It stressed the importance of providing reasons for penalties and the requirement for solid evidence before penalizing for income concealment. The appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income-tax was dismissed based on these considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>