<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1571 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311014</link>
    <description>ITAT PUNE allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partially. The tribunal accepted the entire service charges claim, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument and maintaining judicial consistency with previous years. For travelling expenditure, while accepting the claim in principle, the tribunal disallowed 10% on estimation basis due to incomplete reconciliation between expenses and business requirements, particularly regarding family members&#039; travel. The tribunal allowed depreciation on coolers, finding no justification for different treatment compared to previous years where identical claims were accepted. The assessee succeeded on service charges and depreciation issues, with 90% success on travelling expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1571 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311014</link>
      <description>ITAT PUNE allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partially. The tribunal accepted the entire service charges claim, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument and maintaining judicial consistency with previous years. For travelling expenditure, while accepting the claim in principle, the tribunal disallowed 10% on estimation basis due to incomplete reconciliation between expenses and business requirements, particularly regarding family members&#039; travel. The tribunal allowed depreciation on coolers, finding no justification for different treatment compared to previous years where identical claims were accepted. The assessee succeeded on service charges and depreciation issues, with 90% success on travelling expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>