<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 70 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446386</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction for adjudicating DGGI show cause notices was assessed under the circular framework governing allocation where multiple notices are issued and the highest demand is in a notice relating to a noticee registered at Thane. The court treated the challenged notice as falling within the allocation mechanism and, in light of Notification No. 02/2022-Central Tax conferring All India jurisdiction on specified Additional/Joint Commissioners, rejected the objection that the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Central Tax, Thane lacked jurisdiction. Other objections were not examined at the show cause notice stage and were left open for response before the adjudicating authority, which was required to pass a speaking order after considering all defences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 70 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446386</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction for adjudicating DGGI show cause notices was assessed under the circular framework governing allocation where multiple notices are issued and the highest demand is in a notice relating to a noticee registered at Thane. The court treated the challenged notice as falling within the allocation mechanism and, in light of Notification No. 02/2022-Central Tax conferring All India jurisdiction on specified Additional/Joint Commissioners, rejected the objection that the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Central Tax, Thane lacked jurisdiction. Other objections were not examined at the show cause notice stage and were left open for response before the adjudicating authority, which was required to pass a speaking order after considering all defences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>