<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 90 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34742</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning abatement eligibility under Notification No.01/2006-ST. Despite initial concerns over declaration submissions, the tribunal found the appellants&#039; actions to substantially comply with the notification&#039;s requirements. Emphasizing procedural adherence, the tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s objection regarding a transporter&#039;s declaration, stating that the denial of benefits on procedural grounds was unwarranted. The judgment highlighted the necessity of procedural compliance for claiming exemptions or benefits under relevant notifications, ultimately siding with the appellants on the basis of compliance and entitlement to the abatement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 90 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34742</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning abatement eligibility under Notification No.01/2006-ST. Despite initial concerns over declaration submissions, the tribunal found the appellants&#039; actions to substantially comply with the notification&#039;s requirements. Emphasizing procedural adherence, the tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s objection regarding a transporter&#039;s declaration, stating that the denial of benefits on procedural grounds was unwarranted. The judgment highlighted the necessity of procedural compliance for claiming exemptions or benefits under relevant notifications, ultimately siding with the appellants on the basis of compliance and entitlement to the abatement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>