<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 8 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow payment of service tax in cash while restoring the Cenvat account entry, setting aside the interest liability. The Tribunal found that the appellants rectified the procedural irregularity by paying in cash, without retaining government funds, and considered the lack of appeal by the department against setting aside the penalty. Despite acknowledging that interest might be due strictly, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals in the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 8 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow payment of service tax in cash while restoring the Cenvat account entry, setting aside the interest liability. The Tribunal found that the appellants rectified the procedural irregularity by paying in cash, without retaining government funds, and considered the lack of appeal by the department against setting aside the penalty. Despite acknowledging that interest might be due strictly, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals in the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>