<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Quashes ITAT Order: Tax Department Should Verify Partner Capital Directly, Not Penalize Firm.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73348</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 68 - capital introduced by the partners - disallowed the interest paid to the partners - if at all, if the respondent-Department was not satisfied with the explanation, it was for them to have got it verified from the partners. Rather than still pursuing the matter before the appellant’s partnership firm, which is otherwise impermissible. - Order of ITAT against the assessee quashed - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 11:15:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 11:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Quashes ITAT Order: Tax Department Should Verify Partner Capital Directly, Not Penalize Firm.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73348</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 68 - capital introduced by the partners - disallowed the interest paid to the partners - if at all, if the respondent-Department was not satisfied with the explanation, it was for them to have got it verified from the partners. Rather than still pursuing the matter before the appellant’s partnership firm, which is otherwise impermissible. - Order of ITAT against the assessee quashed - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 11:15:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>