<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 220 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34732</link>
    <description>Additional duty of customs discharged by debit in a DEPB scrip was not eligible for Cenvat credit under the notification and Exim Policy then in force, because credit was expressly confined to duty paid in cash and DEPB debit operated as an exemption mechanism. Later amendments expanding the benefit applied only prospectively after the scheme was changed. The clarification on education cess did not alter the position on admissibility of credit on the additional duty itself, so the demand was correctly upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 220 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34732</link>
      <description>Additional duty of customs discharged by debit in a DEPB scrip was not eligible for Cenvat credit under the notification and Exim Policy then in force, because credit was expressly confined to duty paid in cash and DEPB debit operated as an exemption mechanism. Later amendments expanding the benefit applied only prospectively after the scheme was changed. The clarification on education cess did not alter the position on admissibility of credit on the additional duty itself, so the demand was correctly upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>