<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2134 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310986</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s exclusion of Alphageo (India) Ltd. as a comparable for transfer pricing due to significant differences in employee cost ratios (7.55% vs 60.35%) and export turnover failing the 25% threshold filter. The tribunal allowed miscellaneous income from notice period pay recovery to be included in Section 10B deduction computation, distinguishing it from Liberty India SC precedent which applied only to DEPP/Duty Drawback benefits. Additionally, Stup Consultants Pvt. Ltd. was excluded as a comparable due to functional dissimilarity, lack of segmental information, and failing export filter criteria. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2134 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310986</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s exclusion of Alphageo (India) Ltd. as a comparable for transfer pricing due to significant differences in employee cost ratios (7.55% vs 60.35%) and export turnover failing the 25% threshold filter. The tribunal allowed miscellaneous income from notice period pay recovery to be included in Section 10B deduction computation, distinguishing it from Liberty India SC precedent which applied only to DEPP/Duty Drawback benefits. Additionally, Stup Consultants Pvt. Ltd. was excluded as a comparable due to functional dissimilarity, lack of segmental information, and failing export filter criteria. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>