<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1203 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446312</link>
    <description>HC examined tax dispute involving seigniorage fee discrepancies under TNGST Act. Petitioner challenged tax assessment orders and filed rectification application. Court directed respondent to dispose of rectification application within three months, effectively providing relief without definitively resolving underlying tax dispute. Writ petition disposed of without cost imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1203 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446312</link>
      <description>HC examined tax dispute involving seigniorage fee discrepancies under TNGST Act. Petitioner challenged tax assessment orders and filed rectification application. Court directed respondent to dispose of rectification application within three months, effectively providing relief without definitively resolving underlying tax dispute. Writ petition disposed of without cost imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>