<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 171 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34725</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on delayed refund payments of unutilized Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized that such credits do not accrue interest like a bank account and clarified the difference between duty payment refunds and refunds of unutilized credit. As the refunds were in the form of Cenvat credit and were paid within three months, the Tribunal found no basis for granting interest on the cash refunds. Consequently, the appeals were rejected, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 171 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34725</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on delayed refund payments of unutilized Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized that such credits do not accrue interest like a bank account and clarified the difference between duty payment refunds and refunds of unutilized credit. As the refunds were in the form of Cenvat credit and were paid within three months, the Tribunal found no basis for granting interest on the cash refunds. Consequently, the appeals were rejected, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>