<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 278 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34722</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping duty could not be imposed where the imported goods were found to be of Russian origin and transshipment through Finland did not change either the country of origin or the country of export. The applicable notification covered only goods of European Union origin, so it did not extend to these imports. On that basis, the duty was not attracted on the stated facts and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 278 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34722</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping duty could not be imposed where the imported goods were found to be of Russian origin and transshipment through Finland did not change either the country of origin or the country of export. The applicable notification covered only goods of European Union origin, so it did not extend to these imports. On that basis, the duty was not attracted on the stated facts and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>