<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1177 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446286</link>
    <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered in a Customs Act prosecution where the allegations were serious, but the accused had remained in custody since 5.10.2023 and the investigation had substantially progressed. Continued detention was found unnecessary, and bail was granted subject to safeguards to protect the investigation and prevent interference with evidence or witnesses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1177 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446286</link>
      <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered in a Customs Act prosecution where the allegations were serious, but the accused had remained in custody since 5.10.2023 and the investigation had substantially progressed. Continued detention was found unnecessary, and bail was granted subject to safeguards to protect the investigation and prevent interference with evidence or witnesses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>