<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Confiscation of Imported Goods Overturned: MRP Mis-declaration Not Enough to Prove Intent to Evade Customs Duty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73308</link>
    <description>Confiscation of imported goods - evasion of Customs Duty - MRP of the goods assumed to be mis-declared by the importer - the bona fides of the appellant cannot be suspected just because the vendor / supplier chose to affix a different price tag and therefore, there is no case for the Revenue to order confiscation of the goods in question - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:42:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Confiscation of Imported Goods Overturned: MRP Mis-declaration Not Enough to Prove Intent to Evade Customs Duty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73308</link>
      <description>Confiscation of imported goods - evasion of Customs Duty - MRP of the goods assumed to be mis-declared by the importer - the bona fides of the appellant cannot be suspected just because the vendor / supplier chose to affix a different price tag and therefore, there is no case for the Revenue to order confiscation of the goods in question - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:42:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>