<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1170 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446279</link>
    <description>Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, service tax dues are treated as quantified where the liability is written and identifiable on or before 30.06.2019, including through ST-3 returns, audit material and a show cause notice. The Madras High Court found that the amounts disclosed in the declaration and in the notice were substantially the same, with only marginal variation, and that the petitioner had met the Scheme&#039;s quantification requirement. The rejection of the declaration, and the consequential order in original, were therefore unsustainable, and the petitioner was held entitled to the Scheme benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1170 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446279</link>
      <description>Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, service tax dues are treated as quantified where the liability is written and identifiable on or before 30.06.2019, including through ST-3 returns, audit material and a show cause notice. The Madras High Court found that the amounts disclosed in the declaration and in the notice were substantially the same, with only marginal variation, and that the petitioner had met the Scheme&#039;s quantification requirement. The rejection of the declaration, and the consequential order in original, were therefore unsustainable, and the petitioner was held entitled to the Scheme benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>