<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1409 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310975</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed the non-compliance with its Final Order and Miscellaneous Order, with the Revenue halting the re-export of gold based on legal advice. The appellant alleged non-compliance by Customs Commissioners, while the Department claimed ownership disputes involving M/s Vee ESS Jewellers and State Bank of India. The Tribunal ordered both parties to exchange relevant documents and scheduled a re-hearing for 4th April 2022 to resolve these compliance and ownership issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 20:13:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1409 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310975</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed the non-compliance with its Final Order and Miscellaneous Order, with the Revenue halting the re-export of gold based on legal advice. The appellant alleged non-compliance by Customs Commissioners, while the Department claimed ownership disputes involving M/s Vee ESS Jewellers and State Bank of India. The Tribunal ordered both parties to exchange relevant documents and scheduled a re-hearing for 4th April 2022 to resolve these compliance and ownership issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>