<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1155 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446264</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging seizure of Areca Nuts consignment. Despite variations in goods description, court found petitioner&#039;s ownership documents valid. The seizure and penalty orders were quashed, with directions to reconsider release of goods based on departmental circular and document verification. Petitioner advised to pursue further appeal remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1155 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446264</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging seizure of Areca Nuts consignment. Despite variations in goods description, court found petitioner&#039;s ownership documents valid. The seizure and penalty orders were quashed, with directions to reconsider release of goods based on departmental circular and document verification. Petitioner advised to pursue further appeal remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>