<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1154 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446263</link>
    <description>Kerala govt-owned company challenged GST transitional credit rejection. SC upheld lower court&#039;s decision, finding appellant failed to obtain Commissioner&#039;s extension for credit claim within prescribed 30-day period. Despite applying after five years without requisite authorization, the credit application was correctly rejected under Section 140 of CGST Act. Writ appeal was consequently dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1154 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446263</link>
      <description>Kerala govt-owned company challenged GST transitional credit rejection. SC upheld lower court&#039;s decision, finding appellant failed to obtain Commissioner&#039;s extension for credit claim within prescribed 30-day period. Despite applying after five years without requisite authorization, the credit application was correctly rejected under Section 140 of CGST Act. Writ appeal was consequently dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>