<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446259</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding hotel management business income, finding insufficient documentary evidence to support the claim despite using two different PANs and names. The tribunal rejected the hotel management defense due to lack of TDS details, raw material purchases, expense breakups, and absence of hotel assets or rent payments. For agricultural activity receipts, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after proper inquiry. Gift additions from relatives were largely upheld due to inadequate proof of donors&#039; creditworthiness, except for partial relief on mother&#039;s gift. The sale of ornaments issue was restored to AO for de novo examination with cross-examination opportunities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446259</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding hotel management business income, finding insufficient documentary evidence to support the claim despite using two different PANs and names. The tribunal rejected the hotel management defense due to lack of TDS details, raw material purchases, expense breakups, and absence of hotel assets or rent payments. For agricultural activity receipts, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after proper inquiry. Gift additions from relatives were largely upheld due to inadequate proof of donors&#039; creditworthiness, except for partial relief on mother&#039;s gift. The sale of ornaments issue was restored to AO for de novo examination with cross-examination opportunities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>