<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1144 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446253</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition of share application money under Section 68. The assessee failed to prove genuineness of transactions and creditworthiness of creditors despite bearing the initial burden of proof. CIT(A) correctly confirmed the addition based on remand report. Additional disallowances for fixed assets, sundry creditors, and expenses remained unexplained by the assessee before AO and CIT(A), which were also upheld by the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1144 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446253</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition of share application money under Section 68. The assessee failed to prove genuineness of transactions and creditworthiness of creditors despite bearing the initial burden of proof. CIT(A) correctly confirmed the addition based on remand report. Additional disallowances for fixed assets, sundry creditors, and expenses remained unexplained by the assessee before AO and CIT(A), which were also upheld by the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>