https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446240 The HC set aside the order-in-original dated 23.03.2023, which confirmed the demand for service tax against the petitioner, a company involved in government works contracts. The court found procedural deficiencies, noting that the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to present original documents supporting its claim for tax exemption. The case was remanded to respondent No. 1 for reconsideration, instructing a fresh decision after allowing the petitioner to submit relevant evidence. The process was ordered to be completed within six weeks, and the writ petition was allowed, closing any pending applications without costs. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:31:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446240 The HC set aside the order-in-original dated 23.03.2023, which confirmed the demand for service tax against the petitioner, a company involved in government works contracts. The court found procedural deficiencies, noting that the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to present original documents supporting its claim for tax exemption. The case was remanded to respondent No. 1 for reconsideration, instructing a fresh decision after allowing the petitioner to submit relevant evidence. The process was ordered to be completed within six weeks, and the writ petition was allowed, closing any pending applications without costs. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446240