<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 4 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34708</link>
    <description>Processing of raw material, periodic testing, quality control and machinery maintenance were treated as testing activities, not technical advice or consultancy; merely detecting defects or indicating corrective steps was insufficient to amount to consulting engineer service. On those facts, the broader construction of consulting engineer service did not apply, and the service tax demand could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 4 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34708</link>
      <description>Processing of raw material, periodic testing, quality control and machinery maintenance were treated as testing activities, not technical advice or consultancy; merely detecting defects or indicating corrective steps was insufficient to amount to consulting engineer service. On those facts, the broader construction of consulting engineer service did not apply, and the service tax demand could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>