<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1116 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446225</link>
    <description>The HC reversed the acquittal of the accused in a dishonour of cheque case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption, admitting in cross-examination that defense documents lacked signatures and acknowledging the modus operandi of invoices and stock transfer challans. The court found the defense of ulterior motive regarding unpaid sales commission insufficient. The HC restored the trial court&#039;s conviction and sentence, holding that the appellant established sufficient material evidence while the respondent provided no positive evidence to rebut the presumption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1116 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446225</link>
      <description>The HC reversed the acquittal of the accused in a dishonour of cheque case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption, admitting in cross-examination that defense documents lacked signatures and acknowledging the modus operandi of invoices and stock transfer challans. The court found the defense of ulterior motive regarding unpaid sales commission insufficient. The HC restored the trial court&#039;s conviction and sentence, holding that the appellant established sufficient material evidence while the respondent provided no positive evidence to rebut the presumption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>