https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310959 The court dismissed the revisionist's application challenging the enforcement of a SEBI order requiring penalty payment. The revisionist's jurisdictional argument, based on the location of the cause of action, was rejected. The court upheld the original order from the Adjudicating Officer, emphasizing that the executing court cannot question the validity of the order being enforced. The Supreme Court had already confirmed the order, settling the issue of jurisdiction. The revisionist was required to comply with the penalty payment as directed, and the application was dismissed without costs. en-us Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:52:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310959 The court dismissed the revisionist's application challenging the enforcement of a SEBI order requiring penalty payment. The revisionist's jurisdictional argument, based on the location of the cause of action, was rejected. The court upheld the original order from the Adjudicating Officer, emphasizing that the executing court cannot question the validity of the order being enforced. The Supreme Court had already confirmed the order, settling the issue of jurisdiction. The revisionist was required to comply with the penalty payment as directed, and the application was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws SEBI Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310959