<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1091 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446200</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the provisional assessment order imposing Customs Duty and requiring a bond and bank guarantee for the release of imported goods. The Court found the order not without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice, emphasizing the availability of an appellate process. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal within fifteen days, with instructions for the appellate authority to address it promptly according to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 07:42:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1091 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446200</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the provisional assessment order imposing Customs Duty and requiring a bond and bank guarantee for the release of imported goods. The Court found the order not without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice, emphasizing the availability of an appellate process. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal within fifteen days, with instructions for the appellate authority to address it promptly according to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>