<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1088 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446197</link>
    <description>Delhi HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of a seizure memo and show cause notice (SCN) regarding confiscation of approximately 20,756 grams of gold jewellery. The court held that the SCN did not reflect a predisposed mindset and reiterated that courts should avoid entertaining SCN challenges except in exceptional circumstances or jurisdictional grounds. The challenge failed to meet established legal tests. The court directed the competent authority to conclude SCN proceedings within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 07:42:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1088 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446197</link>
      <description>Delhi HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of a seizure memo and show cause notice (SCN) regarding confiscation of approximately 20,756 grams of gold jewellery. The court held that the SCN did not reflect a predisposed mindset and reiterated that courts should avoid entertaining SCN challenges except in exceptional circumstances or jurisdictional grounds. The challenge failed to meet established legal tests. The court directed the competent authority to conclude SCN proceedings within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>