https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446185 CESTAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order rejecting part refund for the period April 2011 to September 2011. The tribunal held that all disputed input services including air travel agent, banking and financial, business support, chartered accountant, courier, custom house agent, general insurance, facility management, maintenance repair, management consultant, rent-a-cab, and telecommunication services had direct nexus with the appellant's export of output services. The tribunal relied on the appellant's own favorable precedents from earlier periods to establish eligibility for credit and refund. en-us Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446185 CESTAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order rejecting part refund for the period April 2011 to September 2011. The tribunal held that all disputed input services including air travel agent, banking and financial, business support, chartered accountant, courier, custom house agent, general insurance, facility management, maintenance repair, management consultant, rent-a-cab, and telecommunication services had direct nexus with the appellant's export of output services. The tribunal relied on the appellant's own favorable precedents from earlier periods to establish eligibility for credit and refund. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446185