<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1070 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446179</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding CENVAT credit on sulphuric acid, a by-product. The revenue demanded reversal under Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, treating the by-product as exempt goods due to non-maintenance of separate records. The tribunal held that sulphuric acid emerged unavoidably during copper manufacturing and was not consciously manufactured. Since by-products cannot be considered manufactured goods under Rule 6(1), and Board Circular dated 25.04.2016 clarified that CENVAT credit on inputs contained in by-products cannot be denied, the demand was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 07:41:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1070 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446179</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding CENVAT credit on sulphuric acid, a by-product. The revenue demanded reversal under Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, treating the by-product as exempt goods due to non-maintenance of separate records. The tribunal held that sulphuric acid emerged unavoidably during copper manufacturing and was not consciously manufactured. Since by-products cannot be considered manufactured goods under Rule 6(1), and Board Circular dated 25.04.2016 clarified that CENVAT credit on inputs contained in by-products cannot be denied, the demand was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>