https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446175 Punjab & Haryana HC dismissed revision petitions challenging conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour due to insufficient funds. Court held that accused failed to probabilise defense despite account seizure by court order. HC ruled that account attachment was not voluntary act but accused had insufficient funds throughout and made no attempts to arrange payment or seek account release. Defense of security cheque was rejected as complainant testified accused filled cheque particulars himself, and dishonour of security cheques still attracts Section 138 liability. en-us Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Nov 2023 06:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446175 Punjab & Haryana HC dismissed revision petitions challenging conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour due to insufficient funds. Court held that accused failed to probabilise defense despite account seizure by court order. HC ruled that account attachment was not voluntary act but accused had insufficient funds throughout and made no attempts to arrange payment or seek account release. Defense of security cheque was rejected as complainant testified accused filled cheque particulars himself, and dishonour of security cheques still attracts Section 138 liability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446175