<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 2016 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310944</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the matter to the original authority for reconsideration. The case involved clandestine production and removal based on electricity consumption. The court found the tribunal&#039;s findings on electricity consumption contrary to SC precedent in a similar case, ruling in favor of the assessee. The department failed to establish misstatement, suppression, or fraud required under Section 11A(1) proviso. Additionally, the assessment was based on documents recovered during search operations, not solely on electricity consumption, requiring fresh consideration by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 06:09:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 2016 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310944</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the matter to the original authority for reconsideration. The case involved clandestine production and removal based on electricity consumption. The court found the tribunal&#039;s findings on electricity consumption contrary to SC precedent in a similar case, ruling in favor of the assessee. The department failed to establish misstatement, suppression, or fraud required under Section 11A(1) proviso. Additionally, the assessment was based on documents recovered during search operations, not solely on electricity consumption, requiring fresh consideration by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>