<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1059 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446168</link>
    <description>HC dismissed anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. related to CGST Act summons. Following SC precedent, Court held that anticipatory bail cannot be sought during summons stage. Petitioner advised to explore writ jurisdiction if aggrieved by departmental proceedings. The ruling clarifies procedural limitations in tax-related legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1059 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446168</link>
      <description>HC dismissed anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. related to CGST Act summons. Following SC precedent, Court held that anticipatory bail cannot be sought during summons stage. Petitioner advised to explore writ jurisdiction if aggrieved by departmental proceedings. The ruling clarifies procedural limitations in tax-related legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>