<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1663 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310929</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal for enhancement of compensation related to a motor vehicular accident. The appellant sought additional compensation for special diet, transportation, and attendant charges, but failed to provide adequate evidence regarding the nature of injuries and treatment. The court found the submission of bills alone insufficient for increasing compensation. The Tribunal&#039;s award of Rs.20,000 for pain and suffering was also deemed unjustified due to lack of detailed information. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, rendering the application for condonation of delay irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 05:53:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1663 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310929</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal for enhancement of compensation related to a motor vehicular accident. The appellant sought additional compensation for special diet, transportation, and attendant charges, but failed to provide adequate evidence regarding the nature of injuries and treatment. The court found the submission of bills alone insufficient for increasing compensation. The Tribunal&#039;s award of Rs.20,000 for pain and suffering was also deemed unjustified due to lack of detailed information. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, rendering the application for condonation of delay irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>