<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2047 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310921</link>
    <description>ITAT Ranchi allowed assessee&#039;s warranty expense provisions that were disallowed by AO. AO held expenses were not ascertained and adhoc in nature. ITAT applied Bharat Earthmovers SC criteria: business liability arose in accounting year with certainty, could be reasonably estimated at 0.5% of sales based on past expenses and technical estimates, and unused provisions were offered as income upon warranty expiration. ITAT found all criteria satisfied despite future quantification requirement. Appeal decided against revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 14:00:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2047 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310921</link>
      <description>ITAT Ranchi allowed assessee&#039;s warranty expense provisions that were disallowed by AO. AO held expenses were not ascertained and adhoc in nature. ITAT applied Bharat Earthmovers SC criteria: business liability arose in accounting year with certainty, could be reasonably estimated at 0.5% of sales based on past expenses and technical estimates, and unused provisions were offered as income upon warranty expiration. ITAT found all criteria satisfied despite future quantification requirement. Appeal decided against revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>