<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 268 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34683</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that no penalty could be levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1996-97 due to the nil assessed income. The Court emphasized that penalties cannot be imposed when the assessed income is nil, regardless of the circumstances leading to the nil income. The decision was based on established legal principles from a Supreme Court judgment regarding penalties in cases of nil assessed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 268 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34683</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that no penalty could be levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1996-97 due to the nil assessed income. The Court emphasized that penalties cannot be imposed when the assessed income is nil, regardless of the circumstances leading to the nil income. The decision was based on established legal principles from a Supreme Court judgment regarding penalties in cases of nil assessed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>