<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Penalty Dispute: Court Finds No Concealment, Only Classification Issue in Income Disclosure u/s 271(1)(c.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73240</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - debatable issue - Since the assessee-respondent had not suppressed the amount in question and had disclosed it in its return, merely because he declared it under a particular “head of income”, and the AO chose to treat the same under some other head, the assessee-respondent cannot be accused of furnishing incorrect particulars of income or suppressing facts. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 11:55:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2023 20:26:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Penalty Dispute: Court Finds No Concealment, Only Classification Issue in Income Disclosure u/s 271(1)(c.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73240</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - debatable issue - Since the assessee-respondent had not suppressed the amount in question and had disclosed it in its return, merely because he declared it under a particular “head of income”, and the AO chose to treat the same under some other head, the assessee-respondent cannot be accused of furnishing incorrect particulars of income or suppressing facts. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 11:55:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>