<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1011 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446120</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision to reject an appeal under Section 107 of CGST Act due to significant delay beyond the prescribed 90-day period. The court emphasized statutory time limits, rejected arguments for delay condonation, and prioritized Apex Court precedents over Division Bench judgments. The writ petition was ultimately dismissed, reinforcing strict adherence to legal timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1011 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446120</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision to reject an appeal under Section 107 of CGST Act due to significant delay beyond the prescribed 90-day period. The court emphasized statutory time limits, rejected arguments for delay condonation, and prioritized Apex Court precedents over Division Bench judgments. The writ petition was ultimately dismissed, reinforcing strict adherence to legal timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>