<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1004 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446113</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC dismissed a writ petition challenging reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the IT Act. The petitioner&#039;s income from share transfer during acquisition of National Woods Products had escaped assessment under Section 56(2)(viib). The court held that mere submission of books of accounts and statutory auditor&#039;s certificate did not discharge the assessee&#039;s obligation to disclose all material facts fully. The AO had formed a valid opinion that income escaped assessment, and the Principal Commissioner&#039;s sanction was not mechanical. No jurisdictional error was found in reopening proceedings. The petitioner was directed to pursue appellate remedy under Section 246A against the final assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 06:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1004 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446113</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC dismissed a writ petition challenging reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the IT Act. The petitioner&#039;s income from share transfer during acquisition of National Woods Products had escaped assessment under Section 56(2)(viib). The court held that mere submission of books of accounts and statutory auditor&#039;s certificate did not discharge the assessee&#039;s obligation to disclose all material facts fully. The AO had formed a valid opinion that income escaped assessment, and the Principal Commissioner&#039;s sanction was not mechanical. No jurisdictional error was found in reopening proceedings. The petitioner was directed to pursue appellate remedy under Section 246A against the final assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>