<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1003 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446112</link>
    <description>HP HC ruled that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed when assessee incorrectly claimed share sale income as Long Term Capital Gain instead of business profit, while providing complete transaction details. The court held that merely claiming income under wrong head, without suppressing facts or furnishing factually incorrect information, does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars. Following SC precedent in Reliance Petroproducts and Delhi HC in Anant Overseas, the court noted classification of shares as investment versus stock-in-trade is debatable. Since assessee disclosed full amount in return, penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1003 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446112</link>
      <description>HP HC ruled that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed when assessee incorrectly claimed share sale income as Long Term Capital Gain instead of business profit, while providing complete transaction details. The court held that merely claiming income under wrong head, without suppressing facts or furnishing factually incorrect information, does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars. Following SC precedent in Reliance Petroproducts and Delhi HC in Anant Overseas, the court noted classification of shares as investment versus stock-in-trade is debatable. Since assessee disclosed full amount in return, penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>