<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 991 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446100</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune held that unabsorbed depreciation from AYs 1997-98 to 2000-01 can be carried forward without 8-year time limit, following SC precedent in Petrofils Co-operative Ltd. However, the tribunal reversed CIT(A)&#039;s decision on loan waiver treatment, ruling that without evidence of loans being used for fixed asset acquisition, the waiver constitutes taxable income under section 28(iv). The tribunal also disallowed write-backs of provisions for worker liabilities, interest, and sundry creditors under BIFR rehabilitation scheme, noting CBDT had rejected similar claims. Revenue&#039;s appeal was largely allowed except on unabsorbed depreciation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 991 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446100</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune held that unabsorbed depreciation from AYs 1997-98 to 2000-01 can be carried forward without 8-year time limit, following SC precedent in Petrofils Co-operative Ltd. However, the tribunal reversed CIT(A)&#039;s decision on loan waiver treatment, ruling that without evidence of loans being used for fixed asset acquisition, the waiver constitutes taxable income under section 28(iv). The tribunal also disallowed write-backs of provisions for worker liabilities, interest, and sundry creditors under BIFR rehabilitation scheme, noting CBDT had rejected similar claims. Revenue&#039;s appeal was largely allowed except on unabsorbed depreciation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>