<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 984 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446093</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai upheld PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 regarding agricultural income and sundry creditors but allowed appeal on depreciation. AO failed to verify agricultural income claims despite lack of supporting documents, accepting only land revenue records without evidence of actual agricultural sales or income generation. Similarly, AO inadequately examined sundry creditors without obtaining PAN details, confirmation letters, addresses, or creditworthiness verification. However, regarding depreciation on machinery, ITAT found AO had properly verified details with bills and ledger accounts during assessment year 2014-15 enquiry, rejecting PCIT&#039;s observation. Appeal partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 06:02:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 984 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446093</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai upheld PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 regarding agricultural income and sundry creditors but allowed appeal on depreciation. AO failed to verify agricultural income claims despite lack of supporting documents, accepting only land revenue records without evidence of actual agricultural sales or income generation. Similarly, AO inadequately examined sundry creditors without obtaining PAN details, confirmation letters, addresses, or creditworthiness verification. However, regarding depreciation on machinery, ITAT found AO had properly verified details with bills and ledger accounts during assessment year 2014-15 enquiry, rejecting PCIT&#039;s observation. Appeal partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>