<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 975 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446084</link>
    <description>The HC concluded that the term &quot;today&quot; in the court order refers to the date the order copy was issued, not the date it was passed. As the appeal was filed within the time limit from receiving the order copy, the HC set aside the impugned order due to limitation issues and remitted the matter back to the first respondent for reconsideration. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 975 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446084</link>
      <description>The HC concluded that the term &quot;today&quot; in the court order refers to the date the order copy was issued, not the date it was passed. As the appeal was filed within the time limit from receiving the order copy, the HC set aside the impugned order due to limitation issues and remitted the matter back to the first respondent for reconsideration. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>