<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 38 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34675</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the seizure of the Hot Mix Paver Machine was illegal due to the failure to issue notice within the prescribed timeframe. The court quashed the seizure, granting relief to the petitioner and emphasizing the importance of compliance with principles of natural justice in administrative actions affecting civil rights. The respondents were permitted to pursue alternative legal avenues against the original importer or the machine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 38 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34675</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the seizure of the Hot Mix Paver Machine was illegal due to the failure to issue notice within the prescribed timeframe. The court quashed the seizure, granting relief to the petitioner and emphasizing the importance of compliance with principles of natural justice in administrative actions affecting civil rights. The respondents were permitted to pursue alternative legal avenues against the original importer or the machine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>