<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 974 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446083</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal against revocation of customs broker license. The Department alleged the firm was non-existent at registered premises and failed KYC compliance. The tribunal found no merit in Department&#039;s allegations, noting inherent contradiction where Department itself failed to verify the address before issuing license yet blamed broker for same lapse. The tribunal held no grounds existed for revocation action, set aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order as lacking legitimacy, and restored the customs broker license.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 974 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446083</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal against revocation of customs broker license. The Department alleged the firm was non-existent at registered premises and failed KYC compliance. The tribunal found no merit in Department&#039;s allegations, noting inherent contradiction where Department itself failed to verify the address before issuing license yet blamed broker for same lapse. The tribunal held no grounds existed for revocation action, set aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order as lacking legitimacy, and restored the customs broker license.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>