<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1563 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rectified its earlier order after noting that a material letter from the Assessing Officer, showing inability to follow the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s direction, had not been considered. On that basis, para 11 was modified to record that the assessment order was bad in law and was quashed and set aside. The appeal was treated as allowed on the legal ground, and the assessee&#039;s claim stood allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 06:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1563 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rectified its earlier order after noting that a material letter from the Assessing Officer, showing inability to follow the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s direction, had not been considered. On that basis, para 11 was modified to record that the assessment order was bad in law and was quashed and set aside. The appeal was treated as allowed on the legal ground, and the assessee&#039;s claim stood allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>