<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 95 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34672</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the validity of the reassessment proceedings under Section 150(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It emphasized that Section 150(1) overrides the limitation period and procedural safeguards, directing the Assessing Officer to proceed with the reassessment. The court clarified that any misdescription of the legal provision would not impact the proceedings&#039; merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 95 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34672</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the validity of the reassessment proceedings under Section 150(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It emphasized that Section 150(1) overrides the limitation period and procedural safeguards, directing the Assessing Officer to proceed with the reassessment. The court clarified that any misdescription of the legal provision would not impact the proceedings&#039; merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>