<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 955 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446064</link>
    <description>Proceedings under section 74 of the West Bengal GST Act are not contingent on prior verification under section 61, because the statutory trigger is the proper officer&#039;s view that tax has escaped payment or credit has been wrongly availed. Uploading the intimation and show cause notice on the GST portal, together with email communication, constituted sufficient service, and a portal-uploaded notice was treated as digitally authenticated. The natural justice challenge also failed because the assessee did not respond to the notices or contest the matter at the relevant stage, so no legally cognizable defect or prejudice was shown. The notice and order were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 955 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446064</link>
      <description>Proceedings under section 74 of the West Bengal GST Act are not contingent on prior verification under section 61, because the statutory trigger is the proper officer&#039;s view that tax has escaped payment or credit has been wrongly availed. Uploading the intimation and show cause notice on the GST portal, together with email communication, constituted sufficient service, and a portal-uploaded notice was treated as digitally authenticated. The natural justice challenge also failed because the assessee did not respond to the notices or contest the matter at the relevant stage, so no legally cognizable defect or prejudice was shown. The notice and order were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>