<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 935 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446044</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai upheld TPO&#039;s TP adjustment, rejecting appellant&#039;s challenges on comparability of Victor Gaskets India Ltd, Banco Gaskets (India) Ltd, Minda Corporation, and Talbros Automotive Components. Court held TNMM method is resistant to product/functional differences and higher margins alone cannot exclude comparables. Rejected multiple year data use, treating foreign exchange loss as non-operating, and working capital/custom duty adjustments due to insufficient evidence. Disallowed warranty expenses as contingent without scientific basis. Remanded Pooja expenses issue for AO re-examination. Dismissed additional grounds petition as factual rather than legal issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 935 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446044</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai upheld TPO&#039;s TP adjustment, rejecting appellant&#039;s challenges on comparability of Victor Gaskets India Ltd, Banco Gaskets (India) Ltd, Minda Corporation, and Talbros Automotive Components. Court held TNMM method is resistant to product/functional differences and higher margins alone cannot exclude comparables. Rejected multiple year data use, treating foreign exchange loss as non-operating, and working capital/custom duty adjustments due to insufficient evidence. Disallowed warranty expenses as contingent without scientific basis. Remanded Pooja expenses issue for AO re-examination. Dismissed additional grounds petition as factual rather than legal issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>