<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 164 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34665</link>
    <description>Separate municipal assessment entries and tax receipts, by themselves, did not establish partition or disruption of a Hindu undivided family. Although the records reflected a change in municipal assessment from 30 March 1990 and separate names thereafter, they did not show the prior owner, the capacity in which the property was held, or the legally operative mode of transfer, such as partition, gift, or sale. The review jurisdiction was limited to the effect of the newly produced municipal records, and those materials were found insufficient to disturb the earlier finding that the income remained assessable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 164 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34665</link>
      <description>Separate municipal assessment entries and tax receipts, by themselves, did not establish partition or disruption of a Hindu undivided family. Although the records reflected a change in municipal assessment from 30 March 1990 and separate names thereafter, they did not show the prior owner, the capacity in which the property was held, or the legally operative mode of transfer, such as partition, gift, or sale. The review jurisdiction was limited to the effect of the newly produced municipal records, and those materials were found insufficient to disturb the earlier finding that the income remained assessable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>