<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 65 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34664</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 10(10C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the extent of Rs. 5,00,000, even for amounts receivable in instalments post the 2003 amendment. The amendment was interpreted as clarificatory and curative, extending the exemption to amounts receivable in subsequent years. The court emphasized the reasonable interpretation of tax laws in favor of the assessee and the applicability of the exemption to the total amount receivable under the voluntary retirement scheme. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s direction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 65 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34664</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 10(10C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the extent of Rs. 5,00,000, even for amounts receivable in instalments post the 2003 amendment. The amendment was interpreted as clarificatory and curative, extending the exemption to amounts receivable in subsequent years. The court emphasized the reasonable interpretation of tax laws in favor of the assessee and the applicability of the exemption to the total amount receivable under the voluntary retirement scheme. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s direction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>