https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445989 In revisional jurisdiction, concurrent findings sustaining conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were not disturbed because the cheque, notice, postal record and other documents supported the complainant, while no defence evidence or reply to the statutory notice was produced. The court reiterated that revision is not an appellate reappreciation of evidence, so the conviction was maintained. The custodial sentence was reduced to the period already undergone because the accused had served about two months, had deposited the compensation, had faced proceedings for a long period and had no criminal antecedents. The revision therefore succeeded only in part. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Nov 2023 20:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445989 In revisional jurisdiction, concurrent findings sustaining conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were not disturbed because the cheque, notice, postal record and other documents supported the complainant, while no defence evidence or reply to the statutory notice was produced. The court reiterated that revision is not an appellate reappreciation of evidence, so the conviction was maintained. The custodial sentence was reduced to the period already undergone because the accused had served about two months, had deposited the compensation, had faced proceedings for a long period and had no criminal antecedents. The revision therefore succeeded only in part. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445989